
|
 |
2005 Winning Research Project
Enlightened Pursuit of Elusive Bugs: Uncovering the Connection
between Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) and
Phototrophy
It is often in the seemingly simple tasks that an endeavor's true
difficulty is revealed. No one knows this better than Daniel Noguera.
The University of Wisconsin-Madison researcher is trying to accomplish
what 30 years of research efforts have failed to do -- isolate in pure
culture the microorganisms responsible for enhanced biological
phosphorous removal (EBPR). Undeterred, Noguera is nearing success in
isolating these elusive bugs. All he needed to do was shed a little
light on the matter.
For all intents and purposes the process of EBPR is a black box for
microbiologists. Despite three decades of engineering and refinement to
this common treatment process, researchers know relatively little about
the various polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) responsible for
removal of phosphorous from the waste stream. In fact, it has only been
in the last six years that Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis
was identified as the primary PAO responsible for EBPR. Unfortunately,
another discovery is that Cand. A. phosphatis doesn't like
living alone. Attempts at growing this and other PAOs in isolation have
only met with failure.
Noguera and his team believe that isolation of Cand. A.
phosphatis is the first step in improving the performance and
reliability of enhanced biological phosphorous removal. Though many
treatment facilities experience few difficulties in maintaining effluent
limits through EBPR, a handful still struggle to avoid intermittent
phosphorous spikes. When EBPR breaks down, chemical treatment can be
employed. But chemical treatment is not without its drawback. Chemical
intervention increases costs and generates undesired solid waste through
precipitation.
Isolation of PAOs, such as Cand. A. phosphatis, could also
yield valuable information concerning how fast these microbes grow and
how quickly each consumes specific contaminants. Faster bugs mean
smaller reactors, and therefore, lower capital costs. Slower bugs result
in larger reactors, and therefore, higher costs in the construction of
the treatment plant.
But more than just cost savings, a full understanding of the role
Cand. A. phosphatis and other PAOs play in the process, will
lay the groundwork for developing biological solutions that allow
treatment facilities to adjust to and perhaps even foresee breakdowns in
phosphorous removal.
"You can think about EBPR as a process that is well understood from
an engineering perspective. But our understanding of it is limited to a
narrow set of conditions that have been proven to work," explains
Noguera. "With a pure culture, you could test in the lab other
conditions and see how the organism responds to changes in environmental
conditions, such as pH or dissolved oxygen, and understand what makes
the bug happy accumulating phosphorus. We can do a lot of that now,
using mixed cultures, but with mixed cultures the results are difficult
to interpret."
To date, attempts at isolation PAOs have relied on trying to
duplicate the environment within an EBPR treatment plant. However,
rather than attempting to reproduce the activated sludge environment,
Noguera and his team intend to reproduce what PAOs might be doing when
they are not in activated sludge. For example, genetic study of various
PAOs has shown photosynthetic activity outside of the treatment plant,
so phototrophic enrichments will be one of the main culturing
conditions.
With the resources provided by the Paul L. Busch Award, Noguera and
his team will aggressively seek the isolation of PAO from EBPR reactors.
By not following traditional approaches to retrieve PAO from EBPR
systems, Noguera expects to obtain isolates that may not be dominant
PAOs in current EBPR configurations, but offer alternatives for the
creative development of novel, cost-effective, and reliable EBPR
processes.
Though PAO isolation may be a long shot, if Noguera's innovative
enrichment approaches are successful he will have made an invaluable
first step in understanding why some facilities cannot achieve reliable
EBPR and perhaps lay the groundwork for finding a solution. Moreover,
Noguera's research will allow us to explore the limits of EBPR well
beyond the operating conditions currently accepted in practice.
| Water,Research,WERF,biosolids,nutrients,pathogens,stormwater,asset management,endocrine disrupting compounds,pharmaceuticals,wastewater,security,microbes,decentralized,treatment plant,wastewater treatment,watershed,disinfection,sludge,TMDL,UAA |
|
 |
 |